October 2007 Archives
MUST READ FOLLOW-UP: Huffington
Post Blogger Chris McGowan takes heat from the looney left for not towing
the liberal line!
Chaparral
& Global Warming Footnotes - By Chris McGowan - On October 24,
I published the blog Global Warming
Not Behind SoCal Fires. Many readers disagreed passionately, and
I found myself, a card-carrying Sierra Club member and longtime Al Gore
fan, in the odd position of being urged to go to "Republican fact-check
school." Interestingly, the next day Los Angeles Times writer Alan
Zarembo published a piece called "Global Warming Not A Factor In
Wildfires."
Certain critics didn't read my piece carefully, and thought that I was
another global-warming skeptic. No, I'm not on Michael Crichton or Rush
Limbaugh's team. I believe global warming is a threat, and probably
has been a factor in wildfires sweeping through drought-stricken conifer
forests in recent years. My blog, however, was specifically about the
chaparral brushland of Southern California, not about pine, fir and
cedar forests of the West. There is a big difference, as locals know
(or should know). We're talking about manzanita, ceanothus, laurel sumac,
chamise, scrub oak, and the other thorny scrubs that grow on the hills
and up to about five or six thousand feet in the local ranges. In my
blog, I argued that "the blame for the conflagrations should be
placed on chaparral, a growing population, and inadequate suburban planning."
More.
(10/31/07)
You
can't blame fires on man-made global warming - Froma Harrop's column
on global warming and wildfires ("There's
no more time for inaction," Oct. 27) made the claim that man-made
global warming is responsible for the forest fires but offered zero
evidence supporting her claim. Here are a few "inconvenient truths"
for those who were taken in by all that hyperbole.
During the past two years, leftist environmental groups such as the
Sierra Club and the Forest Conservation Council have filed more than
400 federal lawsuits against U.S. Forest Service proposals to thin forests
and prevent forest fires. The lawsuits delayed efforts to treat 900,000
acres of forests and cost the federal government millions of dollars
to address.
The result? Our forests are thicker (more trees/fuel) than at any time
in America's history. The buildup of organic materials (fuel) on the
forest floors is at an all-time high as well.
Guess what? More fuel equals forest fires that are more intense and
more difficult to contain. And it has absolutely nothing to do with
the 21st-century pseudo-religion of man-made global warming.
~ Bruce Gordon, Fishers (10/31/07)
NewsBusters:
Media's New Motto: All Societal Problems Caused by Global Warming
- By Noel Sheppard - As America ends a second consecutive below-average
hurricane season since Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" incorrectly
forecast greater and stronger tropical storms due to global warming,
it's become apparent that media are trying new strategies to scare the
public into believing the hysteria.
Last week, the game plan was to blame the California wildfires on climate
change. This week, it's health problems such as heart attacks, strokes,
and respiratory diseases. More.
(10/30/07)
Kooky advice from one kook to another...
Al
Gore Should Add Go Vegetarian to Global Warming Pledge - PETA -
Matt Prescott - The Nobel committee has made a powerful statement by
awarding this year's Peace Prize to former vice president Al Gore and
the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. As Achim
Steiner, executive director of the U.N.'s Environment Program, says,
we now know "that what happens in the environment is not just about
natural resources but has so many different dimensions." www.peta.org
Scientists and economists warn that climate change will lead not only
to droughts and rising sea levels, but also to disease outbreaks, economic
mayhem and conflicts among people struggling to survive in an ever more
hostile environment. Already we are starting to see the first climate
wars in Africa, where farmers are facing off with herders and nomads
because the changing climate has brought drought and a decline in fertile
lands.
"We face a true planetary emergency," says Mr. Gore. Which
is why PETA has asked Gore and his Alliance for Climate Protection to
make their "7-Point Pledge" an "8-Point Pledge"--adding
"Go vegetarian" to the top of the list. More
idiocy. (10/30/07)
The
new morality - By Klaus Rohrich - All cultures require a set of
moral principles in order to maintain a sense of self-worth. Our own
culture is currently in the process of redefining our understanding
of morality to better conform to the dominant social and political ethos.
All that was once a moral imperative is now passe and a new sense of
morality is appearing on the social and cultural landscape.
Issues such as premarital sex, cheating on exams, attending church,
drug use, abortion and a long list of others have gradually eroded from
the moral radar and have left a vacuum that is being filled by a new
set of moral values.
Interestingly these values, while they assume a moral importance, have
little to do with morality in the absolute sense and tend to be more
political as well as relative in nature. The terminology that defines
this new morality involves words such as "sexism", "homophobia",
"racism" and my own personal favorite "denial of global
warming". Continued.
(10/30/07)
Don't
sweat global warming; Hollywood is on it - By BRUCE D. CALLANDER
- I don't think we have to worry any more about global warming. Hollywood
is taking care of it.
I saw a movie on TV the other night where New York was flooded up to
the first floor of the public library. A lot of people had crowded into
the library for safety and they weren't even asking to see their library
cards. It was that kind of crisis.
Then, the smart scientist got hold of the thing and managed to reverse
the global warming. Manhattan drained dry and was as good as new in
a few minutes. There was a little seaweed on the streets and a couple
of motor boats marooned in Times Square, but nothing that couldn't be
sorted out. More.
(10/30/07)
Barbara
Kay: Score a point for the global warming 'deniers' - Despite enviro-warriors'
best efforts to suppress dissent from "deniers," the debate
continues: Nagging questions keep arising over the causes of global
warming, its long-term effects and whether in fact humans can influence
environmental outcomes, no matter how many billions we spend.
Most media genuflect before Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth."
Every shrinking minuscule Pacific atoll, every less-than-roly-poly Polar
bear is front page news. But facts that don't support, or that counter
the "sky is falling" scenario tend to be ignored or shuffled
off to journalistic Siberia.
An illustrative case in point is a thought-provoking fragment of ephemera
tucked away on the back page of the October 25 Wall St Journal (WSJ).
Does the name John Christy ring a bell? It should if you care about
the environment, so colour yourself embarrassed if it doesn't. He's
the real scientist from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change who was Al Gore's co-recipient of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.
In their "Notable and Quotable" section, the WSJ excerpted
a few telling moments of dialogue from a post-Nobel CNN interview with
him.
From it we learn that yes, it is true the ice at the North Pole has
been diminished to a record minimum. No surprise there: Who can watch
the news for a week without viewing at least one Bermuda-size chunk
of Arctic ice shearing off a towering 'berg and plunging dramatically
into the sea?
Scary stuff. Except that it isn't, because according to Christy, the
extent of Antarctic ice - which accounts for a full 90% of the earth's
ice ( i.e. the Arctic contains a mere 10%) - has just reached its all-time
maximum. Thickening ice may not be an ambitious journalist's money shot,
but it's still - or should be - environmental news the public deserves
to know about. More.
(10/29/07)
2007 Hurricane Season: What Season?
2007
Hurricane Season: Where's the Beef, Part II - By Michael Asher -
Doom-and-gloomers are silent (except
for the "Looney Mooney" story below) as another
historically low year comes to a close - Back in July, I
predicted 2007 would be a very mild hurricane season. Many called
the claim premature, and even irresponsible, despite the fact that other
media sources had months earlier predicted far more dire events.
Its now three months later and, with the season in the final month,
my crystal ball seems vindicated. COAPS, the Center for Ocean-Atmospheric
Prediction Studies, has just released data
showing 2007 activity to be nearly 50% below average.
In their own words, unless we experience a dramatic flurry in activity,
2007 will rank as historically inactive. Just as the year before was.
More.
(10/29/07)
As the 2007 hurricane season wanes,
the "Storm Pundit" looney Chris Mooney tries desperately to
keep the alarmist myth alive. Truly pathetic.
The
2007 Hurricane Season: Lion, Lamb, Lion? - It's hard now even to
believe that the 2007 Atlantic hurricane season started off with two
Category 5 storms. The Gabrielles, the Karens, the Melissas - they've
slowly made us forget storms like Dean and Felix. For the time being,
anyway.
I mean, sure: Hurricanes Humberto and Lorenzo were extremely rapid intensifiers.
But they were only Category 1 storms for a few hours apiece-failing
to provide sustained drama of the sort that makes CNN run an storm update
every hour for days at a time. Except among the wonks who track hurricane
records, these storms were quickly forgotten.
But now, here comes Tropical Storm Noel. Sure, it may never become a
hurricane. On the other hand, it is dumping prodigious rain over Hispaniola,
the island that is home to both Haiti and the Dominican Republic. 2004's
Tropical Depression Jeanne, which killed 3,000 people in Haiti in this
way, is being invoked frequently right now. After all, you don't need
an intense hurricane to cause a lot of death and damage if you've got
mountainous terrain and a slow moving storm that pours down precipitation.
Right now, the fear is that Noel will be one of these, and that the
2007 Atlantic hurricane season will close out nastily after all. Nice
try. More.
(10/29/07)
Senator
Barbara Boxer Can't Resist Blaming Fires On Global Warming - By
Duane Patterson - A 61 minute stem-winder was given on the Senate floor
today by one of California's dimmest elected bulbs, Barbara Boxer. Serving
this term as the Albert A. Gore, Jr. czar of the Senate Global Warming
Will Kill All Life On Earth If We Don't Regulate Everything Committee,
Senator Boxer spewed enough CO2 single-handedly today during her speech
to be classifed a gross polluter. Lunacy
continues... (10/29/07)
More
Hysterical Claims Bush Censoring Climate Change Information - By
Noel Sheppard - Do you find it amazing that the same media doing everything
possible to ignore global warming skeptics whilst almost exclusively
focusing attention on entities advancing climate change hysteria (i.e.
Al Gore) are constantly accusing the Bush administration of censorship
regarding this issue?
The most recent example of such absurdity transpired when assertions
were made about nefariously edited Senate testimony given last Tuesday
by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr.
Julie Gerberding.
Though many in the media credited the Associated Press for breaking
the story, it appears this conspiracy theory might first have been hatched
by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Cal.), as according to LexisNexis, the following
announcement posted at the website of the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment
& Public Works was published by US Fed News at 2:46AM EST Tuesday:
Continued.
(10/29/07)
'Today'
Tries Carbon-Belching Publicity Stunt for Global Warming Awareness
Lauer, Roker and Curry travel to extremes 'to find out what's going
on with the world's climate.' - By Jeff Poor - Business & Media
Institute -- Even though NBC's "Today" crew is fretting over
the effects of climate change and the price of oil, exceeding $90 a
barrel - that isn't stopping them from traveling to the "ends of
the earth" in the name of climate change. The trips will release
nearly 25 tons of carbon into the atmosphere - more than three times
what a typical American uses in a year. More.
(10/29/07)
After hundreds of stories predicting
that global warming would be and has been responsible for killer droughts
in Africa, warmists are tired of waiting. Now that the expected killer
droughts have failed to materialize, the global warming alarmists have
shifted gears.
Global
Warming Causing African Floods, Experts Say - Alexis Okeowo in Kampala,
Uganda for National Geographic News - Twenty-two African countries
are experiencing their worst wet seasons in decades, and climate experts
say that global warming is to blame.
Devastating rains and flash floods have affected 1.5 million people
across the continent, killing at least 300 since early summer.
West Africa has seen its most severe floods in years, as torrents swamped
the Democratic Republic of the Congo's capital of Kinshasa last week,
killing 30 people in less than 24 hours.
In northern Ghana, more than 300,000 people have been uprooted by devastating
downpours. Alarmism
continues. (10/29/07)
Absurdity of the day...
Global
warming may hit kids harder, pediatrics group says - By Marilyn
Elias, USA TODAY - Global warming is likely to disproportionately harm
the health of children, and politicians should launch "aggressive
policies" to curb climate change, the American Academy of Pediatrics
said today.
In the first major report about the unique effects of global warming
on kids, U.S. pediatricians also were advised to "educate"
elected officials about the coming dangers.
There's evidence that children are likely to suffer more than adults
from climate change, says the report's lead author, Katherine Shea,
a pediatrician and adjunct public health professor at the University
of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
"We already have change, and certain bad things are going to happen
no matter what we do," Shea says. "But we can prevent things
from getting even worse. We don't have the luxury of waiting."
More greenhouse gases and a warming Earth will leave children particularly
vulnerable in several ways, the report says:
Air pollution does more damage to children's lungs, causing asthma and
respiratory ailments, because their lungs are still developing, they
breathe at a higher rate than adults and are outdoors more. No
shit! But C02 is not "pollution".
Waterborne infections, such as diarrhea and other gastrointestinal
problems, hit children especially hard. These infections rise sharply
with more rain, which is expected as the climate warms. Maybe
in some regions, but in other parts of the world it will be drier...you
know, all those doom and gloom predeictions of drought, etc.
As mosquitoes are able to move to higher ground, the malaria
zone is expanding. Kids are especially vulnerable; 75% of malaria deaths
occur in children younger than 5. So
this is the new strategy. Mix a spoonful of truth with a tonn of bullshit.
Lets see what the real
story is on malaria.
[...]
The Associated Press reported that Gerberding's speech was "eviscerated"
by the White House, but CDC spokesman Tom Skinner denied it, adding
that Gerberding said everything she wanted to say without constraint.
"This is not a political issue, it's a public health issue,"
Shea says. "If we know the health of children and future children
is threatened, we have an obligation to act." Yes
they've even managed to work global warming into the new S-chip template
- "Bush hates children". (10/29/07)
Blaming
California's Fires on Global Warming - Senate Majority Leader Harry
Reid took some grief last week for this assertion in a news conference:
One reason why we have the fires in California is
global warming. (Listen
to the audio here.)
Reid quickly backed off the statement, perhaps recognizing that 1. It
would be better for leaders to support the people of California, rather
than scoring political points. 2. There have always been fires and Santa
Anna winds in the hills of California. 3. Global warming did not cause
powerlines to fall and spark, arsonists to set the fires, or human activity
to become more widespread in an arid yet forested area.
Unfortunately, Representative Ed Markey seems not to care about those
points. This Thursday, his taxpayer-financed bully pulpit, the House
Energy Independence and Global Warming Committee will be holding a hearing,
"Wildfires and the Climate Crisis." From his Dear Colleagues
letter, dated Oct. 19th, before the latest, worst fires:
Evidence shows that as a result of global warming,
forest fires in our western states are burning more frequently and with
greater intensity than we have ever seen before. Last year was the worst
fire season in recorded history and this season is already second, with
eight million acres burned.
This is not evidence, this is testimony from the scriptures of the Church
of Global Warming, in which all earthly events lead back to transcendental
climate change.
Trouble is, you can't debate faith. But you can debate the propriety
of politicizing every bit of human tragedy in the world. (10/29/07)
The Spoof!
Global
warming causes cat population explosion; kittens being born due to late-season
breeding -- thanks balmy weather! - Seattle, Washington - Pussies
are getting all hot and bothered resulting in an extension of the mating
season that usually ends by October before starting up again in April.
However, due to the balmy weather, cats are knocking their mittens and
having kittens well into the fall and late winter. Many blame the cat
population explosion directly on the unforeseen effects of global warming,
while other say it is due to owners not neutering and spading their
cats. More.
(10/29/07)
Corn for
carsCorn ethanol makes global warming worse - Tribune Editorial
- Corn ethanol is the answer to global warming and American energy independence.
Right?
Wrong.
A bushel of new studies suggest that production of corn ethanol not
only makes global warming worse but contributes heavily to water pollution.
One reason is the heavy doses of nitrogen fertilizer that American farmers
dump on corn fields...
(10/29/07)
James
Lovelock: Reducing emissions could speed global warming - By Charles
Clover, Environment Editor - A rapid cutback in greenhouse gas emissions
could speed up global warming, the veteran environmental maverick James
Lovelock will warn in a lecture today.
Prof Lovelock, inventor of the Gaia theory that the planet behaves like
a single organism, says this is because current global warming is offset
by global dimming - the 2-3ºC of cooling cause by industrial pollution,
known to scientists as aerosol particles, in the atmosphere.
His lecture will be delivered as Hilary Benn, the Environment Secretary,
launches the results of a public consultation on the Government's proposed
Climate Change Bill which is intended to cut Britain's greenhouse gas
emissions by 60 per cent by 2050.
Prof Lovelock will say in a lecture to the Royal Society: "Any
economic downturn or planned cutback in fossil fuel use, which lessened
aerosol density, would intensify the heating.
"If there were a 100 per cent cut in fossil fuel combustion it
might get hotter not cooler. We live in a fool's climate. We are damned
if we continue to burn fuel and damned if we stop too suddenly."
Continued.
(10/29/07)
Greenland
finds growing evidence of global warming benefits - A STRANGE thing
is happening at the edge of Poul Bjerge's forest, a place so minute
and unexpected that it brings to mind the teeny piece of land that Woody
Allen's father carries around in the film Love and Death.
Its four oldest trees - in fact, the four oldest pine trees in Greenland,
named Rosenvinge's trees after the Dutch botanist who planted them in
a mad experiment in 1893 - are waking up. After lapsing into stately,
sleepy old age, they are exhibiting new sprinklings of green at their
tops, as if someone had glued on fresh needles.
"The old ones, they're having a second youth," said Mr Bjerge,
78, who has watched the forest, called Qanasiassat, come to life, in
fits and starts, since planting most of the trees in it 50 years ago.
He beamed like a proud grandson. "They're growing again."
More.
(10/29/07)
Satire
Global
Warming: War Is Good For The Environment
REPORTS the Guardian - "Call to use leftovers and cut food
waste. Return to wartime values and reduce emissions, say campaigners."
Why not just return to war? If the people won't listen, let the knowing
declare war upon their sorry heads. If they listen, hurrah! If they
don't, then so be it; less people means less CO2 emissions. It is win-win.
Research by the government's waste reduction agency, Wrap, found that
"one third of all food bought in Britain is thrown away - of which
half is edible". (10/28/07)
The Spoof
Christmas
Under Threat From Global Warming - There are only 59 shopping days
left until Christmas, but don't get carried away just yet, because it
may be cancelled altogether - due to nasty old Global Warming.
That's because a steady and unabated rise in the world's temperature
has melted the ice pack around the North Pole, and toy factories owned
by Father Christmas have had to be abandoned, as the sites have become
too dangerous to work at. More.
(10/28/07)
Skippy
on global warming menu - Australian scientists claim eating cuddly
kangaroos instead of cows will help reduce greenhouse gases.
One minute, Skippy's bouncing happily through the Outback with not a
care in the world. The next, he's heralded as the latest superfood -
delicious, nutritious and fabulously low fat - the natural solution
to global warming.
A special Greenpeace report claims 20 million Aussies can dramatically
reduce their carbon footprint by eating less beef and more of the local
wildlife. Cows and sheep release vast quantities of methane through
belching and flatulence, but kangaroos release virtually none. Continued.
(10/28/07)
Global
Warming? Hogwash!! - By Carlton Ross - The tree-hugging global warming
radicals are out for one thing -- control of some aspect of our lives,
our economy or our country. The present-day scaremongers of global warming
make no sense in view of the long term history of this earth alternating
from glacial age to interglacial (warming), then back to another glacial
period. How long has each ice age lasted and how long has each interglacial
period lasted? Entire
article. (10/27/07)
California
burning - By Ellis Washington -
While California burns down,
Harry Reid, from D.C. town,
Blames global warming,
Cries, "It's so alarming!"
But Rush proved Reid's a clown.
~ Paul (a poet and reader of my WND column)
Last Tuesday at a press conference, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
made the ludicrous claim that the wildfires presently raging throughout
Southern California were due to politics - that global warming was at
least partly responsible for the blazes. (Listen
to the audio). "One reason why we have the fires in Southern
California is global warming," the Nevada Democrat told reporters,
emphasizing the need to pass the Democrats' comprehensive energy package
presently stalled in Congress.
A few minutes later in that same interview, the venerable senator was
forced to retract his global warming theory by lying, obfuscating and
saying he never said what everybody had heard him just say openly on
TV. And Congress wonders why their approval ratings hover around single
digits? More.
(10/27/07)
Why
light bulbs are accelerating global warming and mercury contamination
- By Mike Adams - ...Isn't it interesting how the U.S. government requires
Energy Saver statistics to be printed on washing machines, dryers and
other household appliances, but NOT on incandescent light bulbs (which
are, by any measure, the least efficient household appliances of all)?
I think we should start with mandated labeling that shows the lifetime
cost of each bulb sold at retail so that consumers can start to see
the different in the total cost of ownership right there at the point
of purchase. That would, for the first time, make consumers acutely
aware of what it costs them to operate a light bulb, not to even mention
the cost to the planet. Article begins here.
(10/26/07)
2007:
Global Warming Alarmism Reaches A "Tipping Point" - By
Senator James Inhofe - The American people will soon be asked to support
global warming cap-and-trade legislation that will be billed as a "solution"
to global warming. These bills come at a time when the science is overwhelmingly
taking away the basis for alarm.
An abundance of new peer-reviewed studies, analyses, and data error
discoveries in the last several months has prompted scientists to declare
that fear of catastrophic man-made global warming "bites the dust"
and the scientific underpinnings for alarm are "falling apart."
I have addressed global warming on the Senate floor more than a dozen
times since 2003, and today's speech will reveal that peer-reviewed
studies and scientists are coming over to many of the concerns I raised
years ago. More.
(10/26/07)
Wildfires:
Global Warming to Blame? - Now some fresh pickings from the Political
Grapevine: Global Warming Connection?
The contention by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and others earlier
this week that the California wildfires are connected to global warming
is not supported by science.
The Los Angeles Times reports a recent study that cited a slight average
temperature rise in the Western U.S. concluded that there has been no
increase in the frequency of fires in Southern California. Scientists
say the dangerous mix of drought and wind has plagued the region for
centuries. Wildlife analyst Tom Wordell says, "That is a fire-prone
environment regardless of whether we are in a climate-change scenario...
If you live in a snake pit, you're going to get bit." (10/26/07)
Agricultural
Soil Erosion Not Contributing To Global Warming, Study Shows - ScienceDaily
(Oct. 26, 2007) -- Agricultural soil erosion is not a source of carbon
dioxide to the atmosphere, according to research published online October
25 in Science. Carbon emissions are of great concern worldwide because
they, and other greenhouse gases, trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere
and are a major cause of global climate change.
"There is still little known about how much carbon exactly is released,
versus captured, by different processes in terrestrial ecosystems,"
said Johan Six, a professor of agroecology at UC Davis and one of the
study's authors. "We urgently need to quantify this if we are to
develop sensible and cost-effective measures to combat climate change."
(10/26/07)
|
An
Interview with Joe Bastardi - In part one of her interview,
Katie Fehlinger sits down with our own expert senior Meteorologist
and hurricane specialist Joe Bastardi, who has strong opinions
on climate change. We would also like to hear your feedback. Do
you agree or disagree with what Joe is saying?
Katie also discusses a new climate change bill that might have
a chance of getting through Congress.
|
|
|
Scientists
Denounce Global Warming Report 'Edits'
Public Health Experts Say Edits Represent Censoring of Science -
But does it? Environmental
and public health experts overwhelmingly denounced editing by the White
House of a federal health agency head's testimony to Congress Tuesday.
Significant deletions were made from the testimony, concerning global
warming and the potential impact on human health. More.
But it's OK for Al Gore and James
Hansen to espouse their alarmist mistruths, and outright lies while
testifying before Congress. (10/26/07)
I'm
suffering from eco-fatigue - By Lila das Gupta - A few months ago
we had unexpected guests for lunch, so I sent my 12-year-old son out
for some lettuce. "Mum, I got the one that says it was grown in
England, not the one that was grown in Spain. I thought that's what
you'd want."
He knew I might be thinking about the lettuce's air miles. I didn't
have the heart to tell him that the Spanish one might be more environmentally
friendly because it was probably grown in an unheated greenhouse, unlike
its British counterpart.
But then again, who's to know? Continued.
(10/26/07)
Quote Of The Day
The White House did the right thing by editing Gerberding's testimony.
There's no evidence that climate change causes public health problems.
The White House simply prevented Gerberding from misinforming and scaring
Congress and the public. ~ Steven Milloy JunkScience.com
And speaking of the JunkMan...
California
Fire Smokescreen - By Steven Milloy - Are climate alarmists using
the Southern California wildfires to fan the flames of global warming?
Are environmentalists and government bureaucrats using global warming
to cover up their share of responsibility for the wildfires that have
displaced more than 500,000 people and destroyed more than 1,300 homes?
Continued.
(10/25/07)
No
to coal
NASA climatologist calls for no more coal plants to avoid global warming
tipping point. - Before approving a costly and irreversible program
to build a new generation of coal-fired power plants, Texas officials
should carefully study the statements of James Hansen. He's the director
of the New York City-based NASA Institute for Space Studies and one
of the first scientists to speak out on the threat of global warming
caused by man-made greenhouse gases. He's
also Al Gore's "Alarmist in Chief" and on the George Soros
payroll. More.
(10/25/07)
NewsBusters:
Fox News Reports, Networks Ignore Consequences of Not Clearing Brush
- By Justin McCarthy - Fox News, just as Glenn Beck previously, picked
up on an observation that the rest of the mainstream media largely ignored:
brush left in place under environmental groups' pressure fueled much
of the fires in southern California. While all of the network's morning
shows ignored this angle (NBC's "Today," ABC's "Good
Morning America," and CBS's "The Early Show") the October
25 edition of "Fox and Friends" contained this report from
Adam Housley. More.
(10/25/07)
NewsBusters:
Global Warming Expert: $800 Billion a Year for Carbon Capture -
By Jeff Poor - If you thought doing your part in waging the war against
global warming was as simple as attending one of Al Gore's mid-summer
"Live Earth" concerts, think again.
One of the authors of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage, Dr. Ken Caldeira,
said on September 5 at the annual conference of the Society of Environmental
Journalists there "would be an annual expense of perhaps $800 billion
to capture carbon from centralized power plant," as reported by
Bud Ward, editor of The Yale Forum on Climate Change & The Media.
More.
(10/25/07)
Unbelievable,
MUST READ! Time to
give credit where credit is due. The most well written, thoughtful and
comprehensive article of the day regarding the California wildfires,
comes from of all places, The Huffington Post. Bravo!
Global
Warming Not Behind SoCal Fires - By Chris McGowan - The devastating
blazes that swept through Southern California these last few days were
largely unrelated to changing weather patterns due to global warming,
as some newscasters and pundits have stated. I have been a believer
in the danger of global warming for more than two decades, but I don't
think it's the culprit here. Rather, the blame for the conflagrations
should be placed on chaparral, a growing population, and inadequate
suburban planning. Fire in the hills behind Malibu and San Diego is
inevitable, and at the moment at least is not connected to our pumping
of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. McGowan
continues. (10/25/07)
Third consecutive day of more Bay
Area Bullshit from the Chronicle. No wonder it has one of the most rapidly
declining subscription bases in the country.
THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FIRES
CLIMATE CHANGE: Hotter world may fan flames - By Peter Fimrite,
Chronicle Staff Writer - The risk of catastrophic wildfires like those
sweeping through Southern California will increase all over the state
as the world heats up, forests dry out and weather patterns shift, forestry
experts said Wednesday.
The 16 wind-blown fires that forced the largest mass evacuation in California
history may or may not be the result of climate change, but studies
have shown that the hot drought conditions that fed the flames are becoming
more common.
"Fires are burning hotter and bigger, becoming more damaging and
dangerous to people and to property," U.S. Forest Service Chief
Gail Kimbell said. "Each year the fire season comes earlier and
lasts longer."
The flames stretching from Malibu to the Mexican border struck during
the driest year in Southern California history. Measurements taken by
the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection detected less
than 10 percent moisture in the region's vegetation. The moisture level
in kiln-dried lumber is generally 12 percent.
"They got less rain than they've ever gotten," said Hugh Safford,
a Forest Service ecologist. "Any time you have a dry year like
this one, you are going to get fires." But
what these numbnuts don't say is that if we DID have more rain earlier
this spring, there would have been more fuel to burn. But you can rest
assured, that more rain would be attributed to global warming, just
as less rain, more heat, less heat, more snow, less snow, warmer temperatures,
cooler temperatures, and everything else is. (10/25/07)
Absurdity of
the day: Basically, those who "deny" that the fires in California
were caused by global warming are "cranks". Really? Who's
the real crank? Answer: Froma Harrop, a long time left wing partisan.
This article is so ridiculous, it won my "absurdity of the day
award", even beating out this
rubbish over at Arianna's place.
Global
Warming and the Politics of the California Wildfires - By Froma
Harrop - It has long been sage policy to ignore the crank denials around
global warming. But now and then you have a weather-related disaster
like the fires devouring big chunks of Southern California -- and you
wonder about the extent to which the blockheads have slowed progress
in dealing with the problem. Leading climatologists may debate how much
of the drought in the West and South reflects normal weather cycles
and how much climate change.
Few question that global warming is already here and that its acceleration
will bring more of what we've been seeing -- extreme dryness in parts
of the United States and more hurricanes. Really? Rubbish
continues... (10/25/07)
Alarmist LA Slimes article begins
with the following deceiving headline, then does a 180 and propagates
the "global warming causes fires scenario.
Global
warming not a factor in wildfires - Southern California has long
been plagued by wind and drought, but climate change may make for
a drier future, scientists say. - By Alan Zarembo, Los Angeles Times
Staff Writer - Are the massive fires burning across Southern California
a product of global warming?
Scientists said it would be difficult to make that case, given the dangerous
mix of drought and wind that has plagued the region for centuries or
more.
But they said the extreme conditions that stoked the wildfires could
become more common as the world warms.
Research suggests that rising temperatures are already increasing fire
damage in many parts of the West. Here
we go... (10/25/07) Update: Noel
Sheppard gives his
take on this peice.
No wonder Katie's ratings are in
the cellar.
NewsBusters:
CBS Blames Warming, But Also Fuel from Putting Out All Fires - By
Brent Baker - A day after NBC blamed the California wild fires on global
warming, CBS on Wednesday night cited global warming, but also gave
equal emphasis to how years of putting out fires has provided more fuel
for them in the form of thick trees and brush. From Escondido, California,
anchor Katie Couric asserted the wild fires are "more intense today
than ever, and John Blackstone reports, man may be at least partly to
blame for that." Blackstone first went to global warming: "Fire
ecologist Tom Swetnam has a collection of tree rings that reveals thousands
of years of climate history. He told Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes that
global warming means a longer fire season." Baker
continues. (10/25/07)
Global
Warming: Let's Rely on Science Instead of Hysteria - Daniel Botkin's
voice of reason ("Global
Warming Delusions," editorial page, Oct. 17) about putting
climate change in perspective while working for science-based solutions
should be heeded by our public policy leaders in Washington, D.C., and
state capitals. Regrettably, hyperbole drives many of our policy decisions,
thus the ever swinging pendulum seeking the midpoint balance. Al Gore
is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for highlighting the importance of
climate change, but scientifically based research that might not track
with the hyperbolic perception advanced by activists is ignored. More
comments. (10/25/07)
Dave
Gordon: Al Gore's melting mountains ... of evidence - He won the
Nobel Prize, an Academy Award and the hearts of global warming activists
everywhere, but Al Gore will have to lose some footage of his popular
environmental documentary if a British judge has anything to do with
it. That is, at least if students in England are forced to watch it.
If schools require a screening of "An Inconvenient Truth,"
the judge ruled,
the students must also be advised of its factual errors.
Another option is to vet about 25 minutes of the 98-minute film. The
remainder includes Gore personal drama, images of Gore in his limousine,
shots of the 2000 presidential election and other scenes that have nothing
to do with science. More.
(10/25/07)
Bravo Arnold!
Kudos to the Governator!
Arnold
Grabs ABC's Shipman, Demands: Stop Spinning Fire Coverage - By Scott
Whitlock - Reporter Claire Shipman did her level best to get California
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to admit that the efforts to combat the
state's wild fires were going poorly. Shipman interviewed the governor
on Wednesday's "Good Morning America" and wondered about "the
comparison to Katrina that everybody's making in the back of their mind..."
At one point, Governor Schwarzenegger cut off Shipman's pleas for negative
assessments of the effort by grabbing her arm. He bluntly scolded, "Trust
me when I tell you, you're looking for a mistake and you won't find
it because it's all good news, as much as you maybe hate it, but it's
good news."
Video (1:21): Real
(2.21 MB) and Windows
(2.51 MB), plus MP3
audio (632 kB).
Earlier, the ABC correspondent attempted to deflate Schwarzenegger's
sunny optimism by mentioning unnamed officials in Orange County who
asserted the state doesn't have enough resources, including firefighting
aircraft. The former actor simply wouldn't go along with this premise
of victimization. He firmly retorted, "Anyone that is complaining
about the planes, just wants to complain because it's a bunch of nonsense."
Schwarzenegger then proceeded to point out that the state has 90 planes
and only wind has hampered their use. Whitlock
continues... (10/24/07)
New from The JunkMan
Clouds
Mitigate Global Warming, New Evidence Shows - By Steven Milloy -
In a study published in the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical
Research Letters on August 9, researchers at the University of Alabama-Huntsville
(UAH) provide more real-world evidence of the self-regulating nature
of the Earth's atmosphere.
If the self-regulatory mechanism is confirmed by additional research,
it will represent yet another deal-breaker for the hypothesis that has
propped up climate alarmism thus far. Continued.
(10/24/07)
Senators Harry Reid and Barbara Boxer are perfect examples
of why this Congress has the worst approval rating (11%) in the history
of polling!
From the editor:
Senators Reid and Boxer are
a disgrace to the "greatest deliberative body in the world."
They, and any other elected official who would politicize the disaster
here in California are unfit to serve in the U.S. Government. I urge
you all to call or email them and let them know how disgusted you are.
~ DEK
Senator Boxer's contact information is here.
Senator Reid's contact information is here.
Harry
Reid Blames California Wildfires On Global Warming...Before He Denies
He Said It. - By: Duane Patterson - After a closed door policy meeting
with other Senate Democrats, Majority Leader and utter buffoon Hary
Reid of Nevada took to the microphones just outside the floor of the
United States Senate, and fielded questions.
In response to a question on the energy bill, Reid said the following:
As you know, one reason that we have the fires burning
in Southern California is global warming. One reason the Colorado Basin
is going dry is because of global warming.
Six questions later, a reporter followed up on Reid's amazing statement.
Question: Senator, on the California fires, you
said that the reason the fires are burning in California is global warming?
Reid: No. Here's what I - I didn't say the reason the fires were burning
in Southern California was global warming...
First, Reid is an idiot because tried to use global warming as a prop
in a current news story in order to advance his energy bill agenda.
When called on it, he denied he said it. It's on tape. You can listen
to it here. (10/24/07)
Add to the list of truely embarrasing
Senators, representing the land of nuts and fruits, our own enviromental
Nazi, Barbara Boxer.
Boxer:
Global Warming and Public Health - Statement of Chairman Barbara
Boxer during full committee hearing "Examining the Human Health
Impacts of Global warming" - By: Senate Committee on Environment
and Public Works - Global warming is the greatest environmental challenge
that we face today. Read the rest
of Boxer's "statement" if you must. (10/24/07)
NewsBusters:
CBS's Storm Quotes Barbara Boxer, Who Blamed Wildfires on Iraq -
By Kyle Drennen - Wednesday's CBS "Early Show" had a recurring
theme in its coverage of the Southern California wildfires: the federal
government failed to provide resources. Co-host Harry Smith opened the
show by exclaiming that "...a fire chief says it's "the absolute
truth," with more air resources, we would have been able to control
this." In a later segment of the show, co-host Hannah Storm asked
FEMA Administrator David Paulison, "Democratic Senator Barbara
Boxer of California complained the ability of the state's National Guard
has been compromised because too much of their equipment and personnel
is in Iraq. Is that true?" (10/24/07)
NewsBusters:
California Wildfires: Media Blame Another Natural Disaster on Bush
- By Noel Sheppard - As wildfires rage throughout Southern California,
media have predictably begun to blame this awful natural disaster on
President George W. Bush much as they did almost exactly two years ago
when Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans.
On Tuesday evening, MSNBC's Dan Abrams set up an interview with California
Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-Cal.) thusly:
But the fire storms in California`s raising tough questions about what
the National Guard is extended too much to handle emergencies at home.
Back in May, before the fire started, "The San Francisco Chronicle"
reported that the California National Guard was down a billion dollars
worth of equipment. Two hundred and nine vehicles in Iraq, including
110 humvees and 63 military trucks. According to report the California
guard should have had 39 diesel generators on hand. They say it had
none. The Kansas governor raised similar concerns earlier this year
when she said the deployment of National Guard troops to Iraq hurt the
emergency response to a deadly tornado in her state. The question --
is this another unanticipated cost of a prolonged and expensive war
effort? More.
(10/24/07)
Not only does global warming cause fires, but now the
fires cause global warming! You really can't make up this stuff up!
M&R:
Southern California blazes add to global warming - By Phillip Matier,
Andrew Ross - When it comes to greenhouse gases, Mother Nature and her
forest fires like the ones raging through Southern California can be
some of the biggest polluters out there.
According to the California Air Resources Board, the blazes raging from
Malibu to the Mexican border will send some 2 million metric tons of
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, plus 200,000 tons of methane and
nitrous oxide.
That output of global warming gases is equal to what 440,000 cars would
pump into the atmosphere in a year, said Richard Bode, chief of the
Air Resources Board's emissions inventory branch.
"In terms of global warming, it is a sizable chunk," Bode
said. "But you have to remember that overall, the state puts out
about 470 million tons of gases every year - so it's about a half a
percent" of California's yearly contribution to global catastrophe.
Still, that's a lot of Priuses. Lunacy
continues... (10/24/07)
NewsBusters:
Global Warming Hysteria Drives States to Sue Bush Administration Over
CO2 Emissions - By Noel Sheppard - For many months, NewsBusters
has been warning readers that the hysteria being generated by the media
and the Global Warmingist-in-Chief Al Gore concerning climate change
would eventually begin to impact energy and economic policies.
Following last Thursday's landmark decision in Kansas to not give an
electricity producer a construction license for a coal-fired power plant
due to global warming fears, more than a dozen states are set to file
a lawsuit against the Bush administration for holding up efforts to
regulate carbon dioxide emissions from cars and trucks.
I kid you not. Noel
continues... (10/24/07)
The disgraceful media and their coverage of
the fires here in Southern California
CNN
Predicts Possible 'Century of Fires' Due to Global Warming - Anderson
Cooper and Tom Foreman warn that global warming may be to blame for
Southern California fires. - By Paul Detrick - CNN exploited a national
tragedy on October 23 by finding a way to blame global warming for wildfires.
During the October 23 "Anderson Cooper 360: In the Line of Fire,"
Cooper reported from Southern California saying, "People are wondering
if these fires are a result of global warming in some way."
Although Cooper admitted that, "no one really knows for sure,"
the broadcast still took the time to predict the future with CNN's Tom
Foreman who warned of a possible "century of fires, just like what
we're seeing now" as a result of global warming. More.
(10/24/07)
While, the Huffington Post hardly
qualifies as media, (more like Democratic Talking Points), here is their
daily nonsense.
Global
Warming and the California Wildfires - By Joseph Romm - Global warming
makes wildfires more likely and more destructive -- as many scientific
studies have concluded. Why? Global warming leads to more intense droughts,
hotter weather, earlier snowmelt (hence less humid late summers and
early autumns), and more tree infestations (like the pine beetle). After
reading the first sentence if you feel compelled to read any more feel
free. Masochists click
here. (10/24/07)
NewsBusters:
Ted Turner: Global Warming Worse Than Iran, Causing Drought - By
Brad Wilmouth - In a recent Web interview with "Foreign Policy"
magazine, dated October 2007, which focused on environmental issues,
CNN founder Ted Turner claimed that global warming presents a greater
danger to the world than Iran. Turner: "Iran does not put us in
peril like global warming does." In a September interview with
"GQ" magazine, Turner had similarly downplayed the nuclear
threat from Iran as he argued that America's nuclear arsenal poses a
greater threat to the world: "I'm much more worried about our nuclear
arsenal than theirs. Iran, at best, can get a few nuclear weapons. We
have tens of thousands." The CNN founder further suggested that
global warming is to blame for the drought in the Southeast, and contended
that the same Al Gore who refuses to debate scientists on global warming
is as "smart as a whip." (Transcript
follows) (10/24/07)
NewsBusters:
Without Proof, NBC Presumes Global Warming to Blame for Wild Fires
- By Brent Baker - ABC and CBS stuck Tuesday night with news stories
on the impact of the roaring California wild fires, but as houses were
still burning NBC Nightly News found it an opportune time to make the
case that global warming caused the fires. NBC's sole expert, however,
delivered a circular argument in which the lack of scientific proof
did not detract at all from his media-shared presumption that anything
bad which occurs in the environment can be tied to global warming. After
reporter Anne Thompson cautioned scientists say you can't know "after
just one season" whether warming is to blame, Princeton professor
Michael Oppenheimer, a leading global warming alarmist who, NBC failed
to mention, serves as a science
adviser to Environmental Defense, reasoned:
The weather we've seen this fall may or may not be due to the global
warming trend, but it's certainly a clear picture of what the future
is going to look like if we don't act quickly to cut emissions of the
greenhouse gases. Baker
continues... (10/23/07)
NewsBusters:
Damned If You Do: Bush Visit Will 'Distract' From CA Firefighting
- By Mark Finkelstein - President Bush has shown that he can be empathetic,
sensitive and decisive. But those qualities eluded him for days after
Hurricane Katrina ... He didn't cancel his vacation until two days after
Katrina struck and didn't visit the region until four days after the
storm. -- "A
compassionate Bush was absent right after Katrina", USA Today,
9-9-05.
USA Today's broadside is typical of the MSM criticism leveled at Pres.
Bush for his failure to visit New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina.
So, now that President Bush has announced that he will be visiting California
on Thursday while the wildfire flames are still burning, naturally the
MSM and Dems will put politics aside and laud his decision, right?
I did say "the MSM and Dems."
View video here.
(10/23/07)
NewsBusters:
CBS's Pelley Uses Wildfires to Prove Global Warming - By Kyle Drennen
- With Southern California in the midst of dealing with disastrous wildfires,
on Sunday's "60 Minutes," anchor Scott Pelley used the issue
to promote Global Warming ideology. He did a segment on wildfires in
the American west and declared in traditional alarmist fashion: "It
appears that we're living in a new age of mega-fires, forest infernos
ten times bigger than the fires we're used to seeing." It did not
take long for Pelley to find the culprit for this crisis as he talked
to University of Arizona professor, Tom Swetnam:
Swetnam says that climate change-- global warming-- has increased
temperatures in the west about one degree, and that has caused four
times more fires. Swetnam and his colleagues published those
findings in the journal "Science," and the world's leading
researchers on climate change have endorsed their conclusions.
More. (10/23/07)
One wingnut to another...
Are
the Wildfires in So. California Related to Global Warming? - By
Amy Goodman, Democracy Now! - Environmental journalist Bill McKibben
explains the connection between raging wildfires and our warming planet.
AMY GOODMAN: As we continue on this issue of global warming, what does
global warming have to do with the fires raging in Southern California?
More than a half a million people in San Diego County have been ordered
to evacuate. Over 900 homes have been destroyed. At least one person
has died. Another thirty-seven people have been reported injured, including
seventeen firefighters. The fires extend from the Mexican border to
Santa Barbara, the most devastating fires in San Diego County. Governor
Arnold Schwarzenegger has declared a state of emergency.
Bill McKibben is a leading environmentalist and one of the leading forces
behind Step It Up. In 1989, he wrote the book The End of Nature, one
of the first books to describe global warming as an emerging environmental
crisis. His latest book is called Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities
and the Durable Future. Bill McKibben, joining us from Boston, welcome
to Democracy Now!
BILL McKIBBEN: Amy, it's good to be with you, as always.
AMY GOODMAN: It's good to have you with us. The fires in Southern California
and global warming, is there a connection?
BILL McKIBBEN: I'm afraid that there is. Absurdity
continues... (10/23/07)
Well it didn't take long for the
warmist to get around to this one.
California
Wildfires and Global Warming - Across the West, Major Wildfires
are More Frequent and Intense Due to Climate Change - By Dan Shapley
/ News Editor - The wildfires consuming Southern California are extraordinary:
Extraordinary because they have claimed so many homes. extraordinary
because they started so quickly and have burned so intensely. Extraordinary
because they are exhausting the formidable firefighting resources in
a region used to wildfire.
But in the years to come, they may become ordinary.
Scientists have already tied increased frequency and intensity of wildfires
to the changing climate, (what haven't
they tied to climate change?) and scientists are confident
that the conditions that will be brought on by global warming will only
make conditions more ripe for wildfire. Really?
This is pure nonsense. As a life long resident of Southern California,
we know what causes fires here; it's not rocket climate science!
Dry brush + high temperatures + single digit humidity + high "Santa
Ana" winds = extreme fire danger in Southern California. It always
has...and almost always in the fall. Add arson to that, as in the case
of the Santiago Canyon fire, and you have a big problem.
Ironically, it is the environmentalists who lobbied successfully to
prevent the forest service from "thinning" trees, and clearing
dead brush in the San Bernardino and Cleveland National Forests who
have exacerbated the problem in the Lake Arrowhead area fire.
If you need a reminder
of the dangers presented by environmental policies run-amuk, you need
only go
back a few months. (10/23/07)
Global
Warming Being Blamed for Calif. Wildfires - By Jim Meyers - Man-made
global warming is being blamed for yet another natural calamity - the
roaring California wildfires.
As the fires raged out of control in a number of Southern California
locations, Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada flatly
declared on Tuesday: "One reason why we have the fires in California
is global warming." He cited the fires in stressing the need to
pass the Democrats' comprehensive energy package, The Hill newspaper
reported.
When asked by a reporter if he really believed global warming caused
the fires, however, Reid appeared to back away from his remark, saying
many factors contributed to the disaster. More.
(10/22/07)
MUST READ!
Mega
forest fires -- caused by global warming or the Sierra Club? - By
Mary Mostert - Yesterday, 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley reported
that "Global warming is increasing the intensity and number of
forest fires across the American West, according to one of the world's
leading fire ecologists."
It isn't global warming, which even Pelley put at a 1 degree increase
in climate "change" that has caused the mega fires in Western
forests. It is the "success" of the Sierra Club and a bunch
of city-slicker environmentalists who forced changes in logging and
brush control which led to a huge build-up of fuel in the forests. Those
who know the forests have been warning for years these kind of fires
would happen.
From 1975 to 1999 I lived on the edge of the El Dorado National Park
in Northern California. I not only watched the changes take place, I
WROTE about what would happen as a result of those changes, after listening
to experienced forest rangers give testimony congress.
What those experienced forest rangers warned us would happen is now
happening. It is certainly no surprise to anyone who has been paying
attention to what has been occurring in the past couple of decades.
Twelve years ago, in the April
1995 issue of Michael Reagan's newsletter, which I edited, I warned
that the Sierra Club was BRAGGING about its success in destroying the
logging industry in the national forests in California. More...
(10/22/07)
More absurdity from the land of
nuts and fruits.
New
Shopping Site Helps Consumers Fight Global Warming - Oakland, CA
-- Cooler, a leading provider of commerce solutions that address global
warming, recently announced the launch of ClimateCooler.com, a Web site
that helps consumers eliminate the global warming impact of their online
purchases at more than 400 of the Internet's most popular stores. When
a consumer starts their online shopping at ClimateCooler.com and completes
the purchase at a participating store, the global warming impact of
each purchase is calculated and a portion of the purchase price is returned
by stores to Cooler to offset that impact.
Consumers who shop through ClimateCooler.com pay the same prices they
would going directly to the retailer. The company uses a product-level
carbon calculator that is the first global warming solution to address
the impact of almost any consumer good or service sold in the U.S. Fees
paid back to Cooler by the stores on its site are invested in renewable
energy and pollution prevention projects approved by some of the world's
best known environmental organizations. (10/23/07)
Apocalypse
Now? - The scaremongers are not always wrong. The Trojans should
have listened to Cassandra. But history shows that the scaremongers
are usually wrong. More.
(10/23/07)
Economics
and politics, not science, fuel global warming claims - (PressMediaWire)
Los Angeles, CA Oct. 23, 2007 -- It took an article in an Australian
newspaper to make Americans aware that prominent American meteorologist
Dr. William Gray called the theory that won Al Gore a Nobel Prize "ridiculous."
And that's worrisome to Holly Fretwell, author of The
Sky's NOT Falling: Why It's OK to Chill about Global Warming (Kids
Ahead Books, 0-9767269-4-7, for ages 8-12, Sept. 2007), a new book for
kids designed to inform, not indoctrinate, on the subject of global
warming. More...
(10/23/07)
5
Global Warming Myths - a.k.a. things you thought you knew about
Global Warming which you didn't. There is more speculation about global
warming than there is about Sienna Millar and Rhys Ifans (will they,
won't they...). So here are some facts to dispel those myths. (10/23/07)
Indoctrination continues...
Global
warming goes to school - LEARNING about global warming is set to
ease students' transition from primary to high school.
Staff at Bathurst, Eglinton and West Bathurst public schools and Bathurst
High have written a transition unit on global warming.
Bathurst Public School assistant principal John Wilkinson said students
at the three primary schools would spend six weeks working on the unit
and then complete the project at high school next year. More.
(10/23/07)
What's
causing global warming on Mars? - After the Nobel Peace Prize was
awarded to former Vice President Albert Gore Jr., NASA received an urgent
call from Spirit and Opportunity demanding an answer to their question:
"What does this guy know about recession of the Mars polar ice
cap which is melting at the same rate as the Ice Caps on Earth?"
They wanted to know what are the polluting factors on Mars and are they
the same factors that Gore says are causing global warming and melting
of the polar caps on Earth. Since the nearest human to Mars is 40 million
miles away at the closest point, and there are only two solar powered
vehicles working the planet, Spirit and Opportunity personally discussed
the circumstances and came to the conclusion that the melting of the
Martian ice cap was radiation from the sun and not man-made pollution.
This seems to be confirmed by independent research of solar scientists
in recent discoveries who say it is solar radiation in the same wavelength
as your microwave oven that is melting the ice caps.
NASA of course desired to be politically correct and referred the question
to the former vice president who was en route to Europe to collect his
prize on his private jet and was unavailable for comment. Spirit and
Opportunity were immediately programmed for a long winter's sleep so
as not to cause a political fire fight. (10/23/07)
Global
warming not to blame for recent hot weather: climatologist - By
Graham Hughes, Ottawa Citizen - People should not feel guilty about
the recent spate of warm weather, says David Phillips.
"It has nothing to do with global warming. It's the result of a
series of high-pressure areas that have established over the eastern
United States," the senior climatologist at Environment Canada
said Monday.
"The clockwise rotation around the centre of the high is pumping
warm air from the Gulf of Mexico into Eastern Canada." Continued.
(10/22/07)
The
True Cost Of The Global Warming Farce - By Tom McClintock - Last
year, in the name of saving the planet from global warming, California
adopted the most radically restrictive legislation anywhere in the nation,
including AB 32, which requires a 25 percent reduction in man-made carbon
dioxide emissions within 13 years.
To put this in perspective, we could junk every car in the state of
California RIGHT NOW - and not meet this mandate.
Californians just approved $40 billion of bonds that California's political
leaders promised would be used for highways, dams, aqueducts and other
capital improvements. They are desperately needed.
But at the same time, those same political leaders have imposed a 25
percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.
Now here's the problem. Building highways, dams and aqueducts requires
tremendous amounts of concrete, the principle ingredient of which is
cement. Tom McClintock is one of
only a few adults remaining in the California State Legislature
More.
(10/22/07)
Involve
kids in global warming discussion - Al Gore has an Oscar and a Nobel
Peace Prize, but does he have the truth, convenient or inconvenient?
Despite his honors and his elevation to guru-like status as both a scientific
expert, without portfolio, and a seer, with photogenic charisma, the
debate on global warming rages. And well it should.
On the day Gore and the United Nations climate panel were awarded the
Nobel, some 300 meteorologists and meteorology students at the University
of North Carolina were hearing a celebrated expert declare that they
had it all wrong.
Further, "We're brainwashing our children," declared Dr. William
M. Gray, 76, probably the world's best-known hurricane expert and forecaster.
That is the part that concerns us. More.
(10/22/07)
Do
accurate reports on global warming - It was so nice to see Al Gore's
beaming face taking up most of your Saturday Oct. 13 front page. The
Nobel Peace Prize selection committee has a history of following an
anti-American, liberal agenda and you played right into their hands.
Jimmy Carter's selection was another prime example.
The global warming controversy has become a political, not a scientific,
issue. Perhaps all reporting on the subject should be relegated to the
editorial page. If you wanted to report the news fairly, how about printing
(right next to the Nobel article) the recent report out of London regarding
the High Court judge who ruled that Gore's "Inconvenient Truth"
contained nine assertions that are "not supported by current mainstream
scientific consensus." More.
(10/22/07)
REBUTTING
GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM - Global warming that is reasonably projected
might be problematic, although not devastating, for the much-fretted-about
polar bears, but it will be beneficial for other species, says columnist
George F. Will. (10/22/07)
Many
scientists do not accept Mr Gore's case for global warming - Dear
Editor,
When I wrote my last letter about carbon credits and carbon footprints
captioned "Does censoring our forests make sense economically?"
(07.10.17) I did not know about President Jagdeo's "offer to deploy
almost our entire rainforest - which is the size of England - in the
long term service of the world's battle against climate change. I do
not believe that we should "deploy" our forest towards this
scheme. While global warming is real there is no conclusive proof that
saving the forest would stop the phenomenon. Guyanese should be looking
forward to the full utilization of our forest. Continued.
(10/22/07)
The Spoof
Humor:
The Cause Of Global Warming? - Hindustan, the Indian Subcontinent:
Fresh from his Nobel Peace Prize award last week, former vice-president
Al Gore dropped a bombshell at his latest press conference, charging
that out of control worldwide humor is chiefly responsible for global
warming. More.
(10/21/07)
NewsBusters:
35 Errors Discovered in Al Gore's Film - By Noel Sheppard - NewsBusters
readers are well aware of the recent controversy involving Al Gore's
schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth."
A few weeks ago, a British judge cited nine errors in the film. Team
Gore responded Thursday in a rebuttal published at the Washington Post's
Fact Checker blog.
Now, famed climate change skeptic Christopher Monckton, in a detailed
report published by the Science and Public Policy Institute, not only
refuted Gore's defense of the movie's contents, but also listed a total
of 35 errors in the award-winning abomination responsible for most of
the global warming hysteria sweeping the planet: Continued.
(10/21/07)
NewsBusters:
John Stossel Questions Inconvenient Truths on MSM View of Global Warming
- By John Stephenson - John Stossel dares to question the conventional
wisdom of liberal minds and MSM on the topic of global warming in
the following video.
The heartbreaking part of this report is to see the reaction of the
children being interviewed. They have obviously been indoctrinated with
only one side of the story to the point of fear. When asked where they
learn this, one kid points to Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth."
One point that John takes apart as factless is that even if global warming
is real, that it is man's fault. Despite recent developments, man can't
control the weather, much less the climate.
John points out that there is another side to the story and that too
often the scientists that have tried to tell it have been silenced and
threatened. As John says, "Give me a break".
Even though folks like Al Gore say "the debate is over", the
debate is long from over. The only reason it appears so is because the
critics are too often silenced.
What liberal bias? Watch
the video here. (10/21/07)
Dolphins
"planning to move into our houses after global warming"
- Dolphins and porpoises are already planning to move into human homes
after they are submerged by seawater it has been revealed this week.
Marine biologists studying cetecean communications claim they have observed
dolphins discussing which homes they will occupy and whether they might
change the layout a little. "People have been amazed to see friendly
dolphins popping their head close to the shore in bustling coastal fishing
villages," said Professor Karl Ingerson. "They think they
are coming up to say hello to the local humans. Actually they are checking
out their houses and deciding which one they are going to nab."
More.
(10/21/07)
The Spoof
Global
Warming is caused by the planet Venus - The lunar calendar and more
accurately the Mayan long calendar predicts 2012 to be the date when
the gravity of the planet Venus negatively affects the Moon's lunar
trajectory and causes disruptions in the weather patterns on the planet
Earth.
At the time, communities which were then dependent largely on agricultural
industries, this was known as the beginning of the end times or the
apocalypse. Now it has become known only as Global Warming.
The event of Venus' orbit pulling the moon away from us happens every
so often and coincides with landmark claims and maps of human survival
such as the book of Genesis and the predictions of the Maya.
In order to thwart this new enemy (or threat from outer space as I like
to call it), we need to re-engineer the moons orbit back to a position
agreeable with life on earth. This should be the sole focus of Global
Warming talks and endeavours.
That new bomb the Russians invented should do the trick. Just detonate
it alongside the trajectory of the moon and nudge it back into place.
Do this every once in a while and we'll have a very nice planet to live
on for a long time to come. (10/21/07)
Europe
to Require Carbon Dioxide Emissions Warnings in New Car Ads - By
Noel Sheppard - As media induced warm-mongering heats up across the
globe, Europe is about to take climate change hysteria to a new level
by requiring cigarette-style health warnings about carbon dioxide emissions
in advertisements for new cars. Noel
continues... (10/20/07)
And so it begins; the gulable, led
by the enviro-kooks, are regulating us into darkness...
Citing
Global Warming, Kansas Denies Plant Permit - By MATTHEW L. WALD
- A Kansas regulator has turned down a permit for a large coal-fired
power plant solely because of the global warming gases it would emit.
Opponents of the plant say this is the first instance of a regulatory
agency's rejecting a permit for that reason alone.
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment on Thursday turned down
a permit for twin 700-megawatt coal-fired generators that a group of
electric cooperatives is seeking to build near Holcomb in southwest
Kansas. The ownership and the electricity would be shared by 67 cooperatives
in Kansas and neighboring states.
The department's staff had recommended issuing the air quality permits,
but Roderick L. Bremby, the secretary of the department, said in a statement,
"I believe it would be irresponsible to ignore emerging information
about the contribution of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases
to climate change and the potential harm to our environment and health
if we do nothing." More.
(10/20/07)
MUST READ!
35
Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore's movie - A spokesman
for Al Gore has issued a questionable response to the news that in October
2007 the High Court in London had identified nine "errors"
in his movie An Inconvenient Truth. The judge had stated that, if the
UK Government had not agreed to send to every secondary school in England
a corrected guidance note making clear the mainstream scientific position
on these nine "errors", he would have made a finding that
the Government's distribution of the film and the first draft of the
guidance note earlier in 2007 to all English secondary schools had been
an unlawful contravention of an Act of Parliament prohibiting the political
indoctrination of children. Monckton
continues... (10/19/07)
From 20/20:
Man
vs. Nature : Challenging Conventional Views About Global Warming
- By JOHN STOSSEL - The globe is warming, it's our fault and the consequences
are going to be terrible. So goes the rhetoric spouted by politicians,
celebrities and the media.
It's hard to turn on the TV or open a newspaper these days without hearing
about the horrors caused by our warming climate. We can expect more
floods, droughts, hurricanes and tornadoes as global warming continues,
and pretty soon we'll have to flee from the coasts as the polar ice
caps melt and our shorelines flood. Stossel
continues... (10/19/07)
The
Global Warming Deceptions
Analyses by Dr. Vincent Gray - By Michael R. Fox, - The scientific
opposition to the discredited theory of man-made global warming has
been large and enduring. It also has been studiously ignored, dismissed,
or attacked.
Ten years ago in 1997 the Petition Project was organized and implemented
by Dr. Art Robinson of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine.
He ultimately collected more than the names of 19,000 signatories. The
petition was as clear and simple as it was necessary:
"We urge the United States government to reject the global warming
agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any
other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would
harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology,
and damage the health and welfare of mankind.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon
dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in
the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere
and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial
scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce
many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments
of the Earth."
I am proud to be one of the original signatories and nothing has happened
in the intervening 10 years to change that. In fact, the growth of climate
evidence and expanding analyses has only affirmed that endorsement.
Furthermore the list of climate experts who oppose the current political
"science" of global warming continues to grow. It is important
to note that many of these were scientists were originally participants
supporting man-made global warming theory. The evidence has changed
their minds. More.
(10/19/07)
Questioning
Gore's Climate Theories - By Han Sam-hee - Somebody has given me
a copy of an interesting book -- "Cool It" published last
month by Bjorn Lomborg, an associate professor of statistics in the
Department of Political Science at the University of Aarhus, Denmark.
In 2003, Lomborg brought the falsehood of the existing environmental
theories into light based on a total of 2,930 individual footnotes backed
up with piles of statistical data in his book entitled "The Skeptical
Environmentalist." In "Cool It," he addresses global
warming theories. He references Al Gore, Jr. throughout the book, almost
as if he expected Gore would receive the Nobel Peace Prize this year.
More.
(10/19/07)
New from the JunkMan.
Junk
Science: Hey Al Gore, We Want a Refund! - By Steven Milloy - A British
judge ruled on the eve of Al Gore co-winning the Nobel Peace Prize that
students forced to watch "An Inconvenient Truth" must be warned
of the film's factual errors. But would there be any science at all
left in Gore's "truth" if these errors and their progeny were
excised? More.
(10/19/07)
Global
Warming: Polar Bear Watch On Arctic Report Card - GLOBAL warming
is good news for polar bars. At least it would be if they had agents.
As ever the Independent illustrates its story that ice (cold) melts
under sun (hot) with a picture of polar bears. More.
(10/19/07)
George
Will Rebuts Global Warming Alarmism - In his latest biweekly column
in Newsweek magazine (circ. 3,118,432), Pulitzer Prize-winning writer
George F. Will says efforts to battle global warming by reducing human
greenhouse gas emissions, such as those endorsed by former Vice President
Al Gore, could cause "more preventable death and suffering than
was caused in the last century by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot combined."
The Heartland Institute has warned of the high costs and inconsequential
environmental impact of greenhouse gas controls for more than a decade,
and it is currently running ads in The Wall Street Journal, New York
Times, and Washington Times challenging Gore to debate his critics.
Will's commentary is one more sign that the global warming campaign
is flagging. More.
(10/18/07)
John
Stossel Exposes Global Warming Myths - "20/20" co-anchor
John Stossel is going on the attack against "experts" who
warn about manmade global warming - along the way berating Al Gore for
saying the debate over climate change is over.
In a release from ABC previewing Stossel's report on Friday's "20/20,"
the veteran newsman and Newsmax pundit - who won 19 Emmys exposing scammers
and con artists - says:
"This week on '20/20' (in our new 8 p.m. Eastern time slot) I say
'Give Me a Break!' to our Nobel Prize-winning Vice President.
"Mr. Gore says 'The debate is over,' and those who disagree with
his take on global warming have been 'purchased' in order to create
'the illusion of a debate.' Nonsense. It's as if the Vice President
and his allies in the environmental movement plan to win the debate
through intimidation. I interview some scientists who won't be intimidated,
even though one has had his life threatened for speaking up." Stossel
continues... (10/18/07)
Patric Michaels visits the land
of nuts and fruits...
Global
warming lecture at CSUF stirs controversary
Science weighs against philosophy on campus - By: Sylvia Masuda
- Controversy erupted in the Cal State Fullerton science community over
Tuesday's global warming lecture in the Titan Theatre.
|
Research professor and climatologist Patrick Michaels presented
"Reducing the Effects of Global Warming in Southern California,"
a presentation which explained why global warming is not an imminent
problem. The Economics Association organized the event.
Over the years, science organizations have criticized Michaels
for exaggerating his credentials and for pushing what they feel
is a political agenda. CSUF science professors said his articles
published in science journals "Science" and "Nature"
are actually letters to the editor.
Michaels' lecture featured graphs and data to support his belief
that although global warming is a real concept, its negative effects
are not as urgent as many claim. In particular, he backed his
information by challenging several ideas Al Gore discussed in
the former vice president's book.
For example, Michaels said he considers the Kyoto Protocol counterproductive.
The protocol calls for participating nations to limit its greenhouse
gas emissions.
"It takes away the capital to invest in a more efficient
society," Michaels said. "For all their good intentions,
they haven't realized that they've delayed the efficient future."
Article
continues... (10/18/07)
|
|
Shattered
Consensus: The True State of Global Warming

Patrick Michaels
|
Global
Warming: Dissenting Voices - By Michael S. Rozeff - If we value
our children's and grandchildren's welfare, we should stop being stampeded
by the global warming lobby who want us to waste trillions of dollars
on a futile and needless endeavor to lower the Earth's temperature by
a trivial amount. We should pull the plug on the political process for
controlling climate. That process can only magnify and entrench the
power of world government over each of us.
The Earth's atmosphere at present is mostly a commons. The world's governments
want to keep it that way so that they can jointly regulate every activity
that impinges on the atmosphere, which is everything of any importance.
If the atmosphere is free to use as a commons, the result is a tendency
to overuse it. One use is as a dump for emissions of gasses. That's
a negative if those emissions harm, which sometimes they do. For example,
it was not too long ago that states tested radioactive bombs in the
air and caused any number of cancer deaths.
How then do we control emissions that are doing harm? The answer is
through courts. Someone has to prove that they have been harmed by someone
else. They have to bring a lawsuit. It has to be argued out and proven.
This is how we get justice. Once a few cases are decided, a precedent
is set. Then all those who are doing similar harm have to change their
ways of operating or face lawsuits.
For example, a coal-burning utility that produces sulfur dioxide can
choke people and irritate them or worse. It has no right to do that.
One or two lawsuits would put an end to it by proving harm. The atmosphere
would no longer be free to them as a disposal site.
Carbon dioxide is similar. If it is harming, then let it be shown. Let
courts rule on the disputes.
We have not followed this method of controlling atmospheric use. Instead
we have gone the legislative and regulatory route. The result is that
we have built up powerful institutions geared toward oppression. I
don't know about the rest of you, but I don't want courts meddling in
the climate either. The Supreme Court has already found CO2 to be a
"pollutant". By this "logic" breathing can now be
regulated - or even banned. Rozeff
continues... (10/18/07)
Global
Warming is Racist - The world's poorest people are also taking the
brunt of global warming's negative effects. Although the average African
produces 13 times less harmful emissions than their North American counterparts,
the African ecosystem is suffering far greater damage. Droughts and
floods, as well as shifting ecosystems throughout the continent, threaten
the welfare of both the people and wildlife of Africa.
Scientists warn that rising temperatures could cause massive extinctions
for wildlife, including lions, elephants, and mountain gorillas. The
climate change has also been blamed as the alleged cause of droughts
which have left nearly 1.8 million Africans without a sufficient supply
of clean water. The water shortage has caused outbreaks of malaria and
cholera, as well as an increase in poverty.
Experts say most African nations are ill-prepared to fight global warming,
although improved land management and natural gas use in place of coal
could both help. University of Cape Town climatology specialist Professor
Bruce Hewitson says that many African countries do not have the cash
to meet the 2005 Kyoto Protocol emission reduction targets. More.
(10/18/07)
What's 25 years between warmists?
IPCC
'global warming' model is flawed - If the IPCC computer model on
global warming (which links CO2 to Global Warming, and treats CO2 as
the independent causation variable) was accurate, then the worst case
scenario that it was forecasting to occur in 2050 would have occurred
in 2050.
There is no question that Mr. Gore's efforts have alerted the world
to the existence of Climate Change. There is also increasing evidence
to support the conclusion that Climate Change is not "man-made",
and that the IPCC computer model is flawed - just as Professor Edward
Wegman of George Mason University said it was. (See
bio)
By a simple application of common sense: If the IPCC computer model
on global warming (which links CO2 to Global Warming, and treats CO2
as the independent causation variable) was accurate, then the "worst
case" scenario that it was forecasting to occur in 2050 would have
occurred in 2050. The hard fact is that the model got it wrong by 25
yea